Skip to main content

Martin v. State

Citations

  • 386 S.W.3d 179
  • 2012 Mo. App. LEXIS 1443
  • 2012 WL 5861729

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • \Martinez speaks only to federal habeas corpus procedure and does not establish a constitutional right to the effective assistance of post- conviction counsel.\
  • in order for a movant to be entitled to an evidentiary hearing on a Rule 29.15 motion, his motion must, inter alia, allege facts, not conclusions, which, if true, would entitle the movant to relief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ahrens, Norton, Sullivan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.