Martin v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “we must affirm on the ineffective assistance of counsel claim” because “[wjithout an abstract of the evidence that was introduced during the revocation proceeding, we have no way to determine if the court’s upward departure from the sentencing guidelines was justified.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Dodson v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2000-04-13· cited 46×
• Coulter v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 2000-11-30· cited 42×
• Michael Clay v. Larry Norris
  Eighth Circuit· 2007-04-25· cited 9×
• Swadley v. Krugler
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1999-09-22· cited 9×
• Jarrett v. City of Marvell
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 2000-02-02· cited 4×
• Atchison v. State
  Court of Appeals of Arkansas· 1999-12-08· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Strickland v. Washington
  Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
• Midgett v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1994-04-11· cited 17×
• Lee v. State
  Supreme Court of Arkansas· 1989-06-19· cited 5×