Skip to main content

Martin v. State

Citations

  • 98 A.2d 8
  • 203 Md. 66

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that criminal intent may be shown by circumstantial evidence
  • holding that criminal intent may be shown by circumstantial evidence
  • holding that criminal intent may be shown by circumstantial evidence
  • reviewing earlier cases and confirming that “one against whom evidence is offered must object as soon as the applicability of the evidence is known or should reasonably have been known to him,” and that an objection not made at that time is waived

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sobeloff, Delaplaine, Collins, Henderson, Hammond

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

33 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.