Skip to main content

Martin v. State

Citations

  • 813 N.E.2d 388
  • 2004 Ind. App. LEXIS 1628
  • 2004 WL 1797686

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • concluding that probationer's admission that he had been arrested was, by itself, insufficient to support revocation of probation
  • holding that the fact criminal charges were filed against a probationer did not warrant revocation of probation
  • holding that State could not rely on defendant’s admission to being arrested to prove by preponderance of evidence that he violated probation by committing another criminal offense
  • noting the long-standing rule that an arrest alone does not warrant the revocation of probation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sullivan, Vaidik

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.