Skip to main content

Martin v. State

Citations

  • 419 N.E.2d 256
  • 1981 Ind. App. LEXIS 1348

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining the difference between an objection to a trial date-made during the one-year period-and a motion for discharge-made after the one-year period expires
  • suggesting a proper motion for discharge should be filed

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Neal, Robertson, Ratliff

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.