Skip to main content

Martin v. State

Citations

  • 804 So. 2d 360
  • 2001 WL 1098246

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that motion to disqualify was legally sufficient where \the judge's remarks could reasonably be interpreted as announcing a fixed intention to have probation invariably follow any jail or prison sentence that he would impose\
  • holding that motion to disqualify was legally sufficient where \the judge's remarks could reasonably be interpreted as announcing a fixed intention to have probation invariably follow any jail or prison sentence that he would impose\
  • granting petition for writ of prohibition because judge’s statement in interview that incarceration should always be followed by probation could reasonably be interpreted as announcing fixed intention to invariably impose probation with jail or prison sentence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stevenson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.