District Court of Appeal of Florida· 9/12/2001
Martin v. State
Citations
- 804 So. 2d 360
- 2001 WL 1098246
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that motion to disqualify was legally sufficient where \the judge's remarks could reasonably be interpreted as announcing a fixed intention to have probation invariably follow any jail or prison sentence that he would impose\
- holding that motion to disqualify was legally sufficient where \the judge's remarks could reasonably be interpreted as announcing a fixed intention to have probation invariably follow any jail or prison sentence that he would impose\
- granting petition for writ of prohibition because judge’s statement in interview that incarceration should always be followed by probation could reasonably be interpreted as announcing fixed intention to invariably impose probation with jail or prison sentence
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stevenson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Minaya v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-08-02· cited 8×
- Siegel v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-12-03· cited 6×
- Konior v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-09-10· cited 6×
- State v. Dixon and MatienzoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2017-04-26· cited 5×
- Kates v. SeidenmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2004-08-18· cited 5×
- D.H. Ex Rel. J.R. v. Department of Children & FamiliesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-05-19· cited 3×
- Isan v. IsanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2016-12-06· cited 3×
- Hernandez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-12-17· cited 2×
- State v. LeroyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-08· cited 2×
- Carter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2014-04-30· cited 1×
- Tyler v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-05-08· cited 1×
- YORLAN ESPINOSA PENA v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-11-09
- Pena v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-11-09
Cites
12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Livingston v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1983-10-27· cited 182×
- MacKenzie v. Super Kids Bargain Store, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida· 1990-07-19· cited 160×
- Fischer v. KnuckSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-11-06· cited 146×
- Bundy v. RuddSupreme Court of Florida· 1978-12-22· cited 93×
- Arbelaez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2000-07-13· cited 73×
- Gonzalez v. GoldsteinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-03-23· cited 21×
- Hayes v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1996-12-26· cited 19×
- State ex rel. Sagonias v. BirdSupreme Court of Florida· 1953-10-27· cited 12×
- Torres v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-06-25· cited 10×
- Eason v. ColbathDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-09-12· cited 8×
- Jernigan v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1992-11-19· cited 6×
- State ex rel. Shelton v. SepeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1971-10-21· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.