District Court of Appeal of Florida· 3/31/1982
Martin v. State
Citations
- 411 So. 2d 987
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “The avowed purpose for such questioning is to test the credibility of the witness ... .when a defendant admits to prior convictions and accurately states their number, the questioning should cease unless the defendant has opened the door to further inquiry.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Per Curiam
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lawhorne v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1986-12-30· cited 39×
- Boatwright v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-07-18· cited 32×
- The Florida Bar v. CoxSupreme Court of Florida· 2001-05-17· cited 15×
- Walker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-09-07· cited 3×
- Mulford v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-07-07· cited 3×
- McIntosh v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-12-29· cited 1×
- Mitchell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-07-23· cited 1×
- Jones v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1998-10-12
- Muff v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-07-07
Cites
5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Savage v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1963-10-03· cited 59×
- Dodson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1978-03-21· cited 16×
- Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-05-05· cited 11×
- Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1968-11-27· cited 9×
- Salerno v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1977-05-27· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.