Martin v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• statute authorized a court to permit the State to reopen after a motion for instructed verdict and after the charge had been presented to the accused
• statute authorized a court to permit the State to reopen after a motion for instructed verdict and after the charge had been presented to the accused
• statute authorized a court to permit the State to reopen after a motion for instructed verdict and after the charge had been presented to the accused

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Ahmad v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 2009-08-26· cited 28×
• Mixon v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1963-01-09· cited 20×
• Bernadett v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1958-11-12· cited 20×
• Cox v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-05-16· cited 16×
• Garrett v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1957-11-27· cited 12×
• Wyatt v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2008-10-01· cited 9×
• Campbell v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1959-02-04· cited 6×
• Littlefield v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1959-02-25· cited 4×
• Janet Kay Ahmad v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 2nd Dist. (Fort Worth)· 2009-08-26
• John Cedric Wyatt, Sr. v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2008-10-01
• Robert Downing v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 14th Dist. (Houston)· 2016-05-19