Martin v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a new trial was required when “the trial court failed to exercise its affirmative duty of considering Martin’s individual circumstances and determining on the record whether Martin exercised reasonable diligence in attempting to retain trial counsel”
• waiver was not knowing and voluntary where defendant believed he did not qualify for court-appointed attorney and could not afford private counsel
• The defendant applied for appointed counsel, but his application was denied.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

7 cases in this archive cite this case.

• ALLEN v. DAKER (And Vice Versa)
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2021-05-17· cited 21×
• Ledford v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2001-02-07· cited 18×
• Raines v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2000-03-13· cited 17×
• Ford v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2002-03-25· cited 8×
• John Longo v. City of Dunwoody
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2019-09-23
• Ronald Coy Stewart v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2021-11-08
• Jermaine Porter v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2021-02-19

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McAuliffe v. Rutledge
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1973-09-06· cited 37×
• Eason v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1998-09-16· cited 19×
• Flanagan v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1995-09-27· cited 17×
• Campbell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1973-02-05· cited 15×
• McQueen v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-10-03· cited 8×
• West v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1975-10-21· cited 5×
• Lang v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-06-06· cited 2×