Martin v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ten-minute delay due to officer’s not having her implied consent warning card in her possession was not improper
• five- to ten-minute delay justified when an arresting officer did not have a new implied consent card in her possession at the time of physical arrest
• 10 minutes after arrest was timely
• 10 minutes after arrest was timely
• 10 minutes after arrest was timely

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Morrissette v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-10-22· cited 34×
• Edge v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-05-28· cited 18×
• Dawson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1997-06-24· cited 7×
• State v. Lamb
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1995-04-17· cited 7×
• The State v. Domenge-Delhoyo
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-07-15· cited 6×
• Hall v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-01-19· cited 2×
• State v. Holmes
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1996-11-25· cited 2×
• State v. Monique Domenge-Delhoyo
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2016-07-15

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mims v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1991-09-23· cited 80×
• Perano v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1983-03-01· cited 79×
• Garrett v. Department of Public Safety
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1976-09-07· cited 37×
• Vandiver v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1993-03-16· cited 18×
• Perano v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1983-07-13· cited 6×
• Hopper v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1985-07-09· cited 2×