· 12/3/1992
Martin v. South Carolina Bank
Citations
- 811 F. Supp. 679
- 16 Employee Benefits Cas. (BNA) 1820
- 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19317
- 1992 WL 385878
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Undoubtedly, the most compelling reason for transfer is that there are related proceedings pending in the [transferee forum].”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fitzpatrick
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.