· 5/8/1992
Martin v. Singletary
Citations
- 795 F. Supp. 1572
- 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7836
- 1992 WL 133482
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the logical antecedence exception, while narrow, applies to \nation-wide class actions in which claims [are] brought under parallel provisions of different states' consumer protection or antitrust laws\
- explaining that logical antecedence “is inapplicable to [a] case involving a challenge to the sole named plaintiffs standing to bring a claim under a separate cause of action which it itself does not have standing to bring”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: King
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.