Skip to main content
· 5/8/1992

Martin v. Singletary

Citations

  • 795 F. Supp. 1572
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 7836
  • 1992 WL 133482

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that the logical antecedence exception, while narrow, applies to \nation-wide class actions in which claims [are] brought under parallel provisions of different states' consumer protection or antitrust laws\
  • explaining that logical antecedence “is inapplicable to [a] case involving a challenge to the sole named plaintiffs standing to bring a claim under a separate cause of action which it itself does not have standing to bring”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: King

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.