Skip to main content
· 6/7/1913

Martin v. Shumway

Citations

  • 89 Kan. 892
  • 132 P. 993
  • 1913 Kan. LEXIS 144

Syllabus

<p>SYLLABUS BY THE COURT.</p> <p>Advancement or Gift? — Deed Father to Son — Evidence—Subsequent Statements of Grantor. Upon the issue whether a deed made by a father to a son was a preferential gift or an advancement, subsequent statements of the grantor are admissible in evidence, if they tend to show what his purpose was at the time of its execution, regardless of which side of the controversy they support.</p>

Judges: Mason

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.