Skip to main content
· 7/31/1995

Martin v. Shalala

Citations

  • 63 F.3d 497

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing when a complaint asserts plaintiff has not received benefits, and seeks damages for lost benefits “we cannot consider it as anything other than a claim for 5 higher benefits” and it is “in no way collateral to an amounts determination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.