Martin v. Scaife

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[I]n Keating, this Court established the principle that a claimant is not entitled to a double recovery, unless, of course, the circumstances show an agreement to the contrary or there has been a waiver.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Lovelace v. Webster
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1995-02-24· cited 2×
• Dudley v. Anderson
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 2003-09-12· cited 1×

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Keating v. Contractors Tire Service, Inc.
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1983-03-04· cited 9×
• Alford v. Jones
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1988-08-26· cited 8×
• Empiregas, Inc., of Belle Mina v. Suggs
  Supreme Court of Alabama· 1990-06-29· cited 8×
• Hannah v. Brown
  Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama· 1981-06-10· cited 5×