Martin v. Safeguard Scientifics, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• analyzing California’s public policy interest in 18 the case despite the choice of law provision stating that matters “shall be governed by the 19 laws of the State of New York”
• analyzing California’s public policy interest in 18 the case despite the choice of law provision stating that matters “shall be governed by the 19 laws of the State of New York”
• \[I]t is never sufficient to establish only that a chain of command eventually ends at the parent's headquarters.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).