Skip to main content
Texas Supreme Court· 11/10/1882

Martin v. Roberts

Citations

  • 57 Tex. 564
  • 1882 Tex. LEXIS 180

Syllabus

<p>1. Mechanic’s lien — Contracts either verbal or written.—For the purposes of registration the statute divides contracts, out of which a mechanic’s lien arises by law, into two classes — verbal and written.</p> <p>2. Written contract—Signature of.—A contract is written when all of its terms are in writing, and the instrument is orally accepted by both parties, though signed only by one.</p> <p>3. Same — Bond.—A bond embodying all the terms of the contract, and conditioned for its faithful performance on the part of the mechanic, signed only by him and his sureties, but accepted and acted on by both parties, is a written contract, and if duly recorded, fixes the mechanic’s lien.</p> <p>4. Record of contract — Specifications.— The omission, in the record of such a bond, of some of the specifications appended to it, is immaterial.</p> <p>5. Express lien.— If the written contract recites that the mechanic’s lien is reserved on a building, it seems that it would show an express lien by contract, independent of the mechanic’s lien which the law creates, when its terms are complied with.</p>

Judges: Gould

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

1 case in this archive is cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.