Martin v. Reid

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that In Re Bridgestone “did not mean that nationwide classes are impermissible as a matter of law”
• upholding a class settle- ment in a products-liability case and discussing the general availability of nationwide classes and settlements

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Beaton v. Speedypc Software
  Seventh Circuit· 2018-10-31· cited 117×
• Al Haj v. Pfizer Inc.
  E.D. Illinois· 2018-04-13· cited 15×
• In re 100% Grated Parmesan Cheese Mktg. & Sales Practices Litig.
  E.D. Illinois· 2018-11-01· cited 6×
• In re FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., Employment Practices Litigation
  N.D. Indiana· 2017-04-28· cited 4×
• Archie Beaton v. SpeedyPC Software
  Seventh Circuit· 2018-10-31

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Amchem Products, Inc. v. Windsor
  Supreme Court· 1997-06-25· cited 4,991×
• Ortiz v. Fibreboard Corp.
  Supreme Court· 1999-06-23· cited 776×
• Cheryl Reynolds v. Beneficial National Bank, Appeals of Belinda Peterson
  Seventh Circuit· 2002-04-23· cited 224×
• In re Bridgestone/Firestone, Inc.
  Seventh Circuit· 2002-05-02· cited 194×
• Pella Corp. v. Saltzman
  Seventh Circuit· 2010-05-20· cited 102×
• Isby v. Bayh
  Seventh Circuit· 1996-02-05· cited 82×
• James Hayes v. Accretive Health, Incorporated
  Seventh Circuit· 2014-12-09· cited 50×

Other cases named Martin v. Reid

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Martin v. Reid
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1947-03-07
• Martin v. Reid
  Louisiana Court of Appeal· 1972-05-26