Martin v. Proctor

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a prescriptive easement did not exist because “the use was permissive in its inception” and “there was no evidence of any ‘decisive act’” that indicated an “adverse and hostile claim”
• easement begun by permission continues to be regarded as permissive until decisive act indicating adverse and hostile claim

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).