Martin v. MTA Bridges & Tunnels

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that failure to upgrade the plaintiff’s job title to “manager,” for purposes of the summary judgment motion, was an adverse employment action
• “[A] plaintiff must do more than state that she is a member of a protected class who suffered an adverse employment action.”
• “No reasonable employee would think being asked to perform tasks that are part of her job description constituted a materially adverse employment action.” (citing White, 548 U.S. at 69)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).