Skip to main content
· 1/16/1924

Martin v. McKean

Citations

  • 257 S.W. 241

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We presume that the legislature ‘understands the legal import of the words it uses and does not use language idly, but rather intends that meaning should be given to each word.’”
  • “[W]e read the statutory design as a whole, giving consistent, harmonious, and sensible effect to all of its parts. ... Often [one of] the best guides to legislative intent [is] the context in which the statutory provisions appear .... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bishop, Cureton, Entered, Recommended, Supreme, Will

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.