Michigan Supreme Court· 8/22/1995
Martin v. Martin
Citations
- 450 Mich. 204
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- hearing to determine whether to withdraw life support also included evidence establishing that patient could not make his own decision
- overruled on other grounds, State Farm Fire Cas. Co. v. Owen , 729 So.2d 834 (Ala. 1999)
- only declining to apply the best interests standard because the patient had been competent and had expressed his wishes
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Levin, Brickley, Cavanagh, Boyle, Riley, Weaver, Mallett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
36 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- In Re WilliamsMichigan Court of Appeals· 2009-11-24· cited 385×
- People v. KevorkianMichigan Court of Appeals· 2002-02-05· cited 283×
- Hunter v. HunterMichigan Supreme Court· 2009-07-31· cited 108×
- In Re AMBMichigan Court of Appeals· 2002-01-25· cited 83×
- Kefgen v. DavidsonMichigan Court of Appeals· 2000-09-19· cited 81×
- Thomas M. Cooley Law School v. Kurzon Strauss, LLPSixth Circuit· 2014-07-02· cited 73×
- In Re WirsingMichigan Supreme Court· 1998-02-03· cited 57×
- Conagra, Inc v. Farmers State BankMichigan Court of Appeals· 1999-11-19· cited 56×
- in Re Conservatorship of Rhea BrodyMichigan Court of Appeals· 2017-09-19· cited 55×
- Reed v. BretonMichigan Supreme Court· 2006-07-19· cited 54×
- Smith v. Anonymous Joint EnterpriseMichigan Supreme Court· 2010-07-30· cited 50×
- Taylor v. KurapatiMichigan Court of Appeals· 1999-10-08· cited 40×
- In re ASFMichigan Court of Appeals· 2015-07-14· cited 40×
- In Re CONSERVATORSHIP OF BITTNERMichigan Court of Appeals· 2015-09-08· cited 28×
- Knight v. Beverly H. C. Bay Manor H. C. Ctr.Supreme Court of Alabama· 2001-11-02· cited 26×
- Woods Ex Rel. Simpson v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2004-08-26· cited 21×
- People v. WilliamsMichigan Court of Appeals· 1998-06-17· cited 18×
- In Re ChmuraMichigan Supreme Court· 2001-05-30· cited 14×
- Dewey v. TaborMichigan Court of Appeals· 1998-01-22· cited 13×
- Blair v. Inside Edition ProductionsS.D. New York· 2014-03-14· cited 11×
Cites
23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Addington v. TexasSupreme Court· 1979-04-30· cited 3,004×
- Cruzan Ex Rel. Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Department of HealthSupreme Court· 1990-06-25· cited 946×
- Matter of ConroySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1985-01-17· cited 296×
- Eichner v. DillonNew York Court of Appeals· 1981-03-31· cited 240×
- State v. HodgeSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1984-02-07· cited 198×
- Matter of JobesSupreme Court of New Jersey· 1987-06-24· cited 146×
- Rasmussen by Mitchell v. FlemingArizona Supreme Court· 1987-07-23· cited 108×
- In Re Estate of LongewayIllinois Supreme Court· 1989-11-13· cited 103×
- In re EichnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1980-03-27· cited 72×
- Cruzan Ex Rel. Cruzan v. HarmonSupreme Court of Missouri· 1988-11-16· cited 65×
- In Re CornetMichigan Supreme Court· 1985-08-26· cited 61×
- Matter of Conservatorship of TorresSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1984-11-02· cited 60×
- Leach v. Akron General Medical CenterSummit County Court of Common Pleas· 1980-12-18· cited 56×
- DeGrella by and Through Parrent v. ElstonKentucky Supreme Court· 1993-07-15· cited 39×
- In Re RosebushMichigan Court of Appeals· 1992-09-08· cited 38×
- Guardianship of DoeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1992-01-06· cited 29×
- In Re SwanSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1990-02-15· cited 22×
- In Re MartinMichigan Court of Appeals· 1993-07-19· cited 20×
- In Re FioriSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1995-01-17· cited 15×
- Werth v. TaylorMichigan Court of Appeals· 1991-07-08· cited 14×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.