Martin v. Manning, Emerson & Morris

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• setting forth same principle in administrative appeal and applying it to claim that was not distinctly raised before administrative board
• ‘‘Our inquiry, how- ever, does not end with the text of [the statute]. We also have carefully reviewed the legislative history . . . .’’
• “[w]here a particular statute of limita- tions . . . is not jurisdictional and has not been pleaded, [the opposing party] is entitled to conclude that it was waived” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• An appellate court will not address a claim unless “distinctly” raised at trial, and a “claim is distinctly raised if it is so stated as to bring to the attention of the court the precise matter on which its decision is being asked.”
• An ap pellate court will not address a claim unless “distinctly” raised at trial, and a “claim is distinctly raised if it is so stated as to bring t o the 14 attention of the court the precise matter on which its decision is being asked.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).