Martin v. Mahr Machine Rebuilding
Citations
- 2017 Ohio 1101
Syllabus
TORTS - trial court did not require plaintiff to prove new element of conversion, i.e., that defendant's conduct was unlawful trial court did not create new affirmative defense to tort of conversion where a third party gives permission to defendant to commit the tort rather, trial court simply found that because defendant's actions were taken on third party's property with its permission, defendant did not engage in wrongful act and thus was not liable in conversion.
Judges: Rice
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.