· 9/4/1981
Martin v. Little, Brown and Co.
Citations
- 450 A.2d 984
- 304 Pa. Super. 424
- 1981 Pa. Super. LEXIS 3364
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- threat of legal counterclaim, even if entirely lacking in merit, does not constitute outrageous conduct
- \ 'Quasi-contracts may be found in the absence of any expression of assent by the party to be charged and may indeed be found in spite of the party's contrary intention.' \
- “An implied contract is an agreement which legitimately can be inferred from the intention of the parties as evidenced by the circumstances and ‘the ordinary course of dealing. . .’”
- “a promise to pay the reasonable value of the service is implied where one performs for another, with the other’s knowledge, a useful service of a character that is usually charged for, and the latter expresses no dissent or avails himself of the service.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Wickersham, McEwen, Wieand
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.