Martin v. Laurel Cable TV, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The [trial] court properly accepted parol testimony to explain circumstances surrounding the lease agreement, thus resolving the ambiguity existing in the instrument.” (citing §§ 1-4-102 and 28-2-905(2), MCA)
• “The role of the judge is to construe an instrument according to its terms or its substance, not to insert or omit terms.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).