Skip to main content
· 1/28/1918

Martin v. Lankford

Citations

  • 245 U.S. 547
  • 38 S. Ct. 205
  • 62 L. Ed. 464
  • 1918 U.S. LEXIS 2104

Syllabus

<p>This action was similar to Johnson v. Lankford, ante, 541. Here, however, plaintiff sought damages measured by the excess of his claims as depositor over his liability as a stockholder of the bank; and there was not diverse citizenship. Held, (1) that the action was not against the State but against the defendant Bank Commissioner personally (and his surety) because of his alleged tortious conduct in violating the state law, and (2) that allegations to the effect that by the Commissioner’s wrongful administration of the state law plaintiff’s privileges and immunities were abridged and his property taken without due process, in violation of the Constitution, were to be taken as in emphasis of the Commissioner’s wrongdoing, not as an independent ground of recovery; and, in the absence of diverse citizenship, the District Court lacked jurisdiction.</p>

Judges: McKenna

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.