Martin v. Lamanna

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding releases to be consensual and permissible where “parties were provided detailed instructions on how to opt out”
• finding consensual releases where releasing “parties were provided detailed instructions on how to opt out, and had the opportunity to do so by marking their ballots.”
• characterizing as consensual third-party releases included in plan of reorganization where “parties were provided detailed instructions on how to opt out, and had the opportunity to do so”
• permitting a release when postpetition work is performed without compensation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).