Skip to main content
· 4/20/1964

Martin v. L. & A. CONTRACTING CO.

Citations

  • 162 So. 2d 870
  • 249 Miss. 441
  • 1964 Miss. LEXIS 405

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding the employer estopped from relying on the defense of statute of limitations where the employer failed to report the injury and voluntarily paid the claimant compensation
  • employer estopped from relying on two-year statute of limitations where employer failed to comply with notice requirement and employer arranged coverage from Florida instead of Mississippi because Florida benefits were less
  • employer estopped from relying on two-year statute of limitations where employer failed to comply with notice requirement and employer arranged coverage from Florida instead of Mississippi because Florida benefits were less
  • more than one statute can apply to a single compensable injury, so long as each state has a relevant interest in the case; successive awards can be made in different states, deducting the amount of the first award from the second
  • more than one statute can apply to a single compensable injury, so long as each state has a relevant interest in the case; successive awards can be made in different states, deducting the amount of the first award from the second

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ethridge, Kyle, McElroy, Rodgers, Brady

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.