Martin v. Kirkpatrick

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that, for 24 pleading purposes, plaintiffs had sufficiently alleged facts to support a third party 25 beneficiary exception to the privity requirement under a breach of implied warranty 26 claim based on the laws of Florida, New York, and others
• applying Rule 9(b) to claim under MPCFA

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).