Washington Supreme Court· 4/6/1967
Martin v. Kidwiler
Citations
- 426 P.2d 489
- 71 Wash. 2d 47
- 1967 Wash. LEXIS 901
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- presumed intoxication of one of the parties was a comment on the evidence
- there must be not only “knowledge of a general danger,” but also knowledge of the “particular danger,” and “the knowledge and appreciation [of danger] by the plaintiff is to be directed toward the particular danger or risk which ends in the plaintiff’s injury”
- there must be not only knowledge of a general danger, but also knowledge of the particular danger, and the knowledge and appreciation of danger by the plaintiff is to be directed toward the particular danger or risk which ends in the plaintiffs injury
- there must be not only “knowledge of a general danger,” but also knowledge of the “particular danger,” and “the knowledge and appreciation [of danger] by the plaintiff is to be directed toward the particular danger or risk which ends in the plaintiff’s injury”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barnett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
13 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Lyons v. Redding Construction Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1973-11-08· cited 55×
- Koker v. Armstrong Cork, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 1991-03-06· cited 52×
- Hogenson v. Service Armament Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1969-11-06· cited 39×
- Shorter v. DruryWashington Supreme Court· 1985-01-11· cited 37×
- State v. HaackCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1997-10-02· cited 37×
- Home v. North Kitsap School DistrictCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-10-02· cited 22×
- Wood v. PostelthwaiteCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1972-05-08· cited 21×
- Erie v. WhiteCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1998-09-04· cited 16×
- Hamilton v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1973-06-25· cited 9×
- Simpson v. MayCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1971-07-01· cited 8×
- John J. Runnings v. Ford Motor Company, a Michigan CorporationNinth Circuit· 1972-07-24· cited 7×
- Wirtz v. GILLOGLYCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-09-01· cited 5×
- Clark v. ParrishWashington Supreme Court· 1968-11-07· cited 1×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Vierra v. Fifth Avenue Rental ServiceCalifornia Supreme Court· 1963-08-06· cited 72×
- Grey v. Fibreboard Paper Products Co.California Supreme Court· 1966-09-29· cited 48×
- Sewell v. MacRaeWashington Supreme Court· 1958-03-27· cited 28×
- Kingwell v. HartWashington Supreme Court· 1954-10-15· cited 26×
- Cooper v. Pay-N-Save Drugs, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1962-04-26· cited 22×
- Bailey v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Washington Supreme Court· 1960-03-10· cited 10×
- Handler v. OsmanWashington Supreme Court· 1962-11-21· cited 9×
- Tabert v. ZierWashington Supreme Court· 1962-02-08· cited 5×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.