Ohio Court of Appeals· 11/26/2025
Martin v. James
Citations
- 2025 Ohio 5324
Syllabus
The trial court did not err in dismissing appellant's complaint pursuant to Civ.R. 12(B)(6) where the two named defendants were a decedent and a bank that was not a party to the alleged promissory note between appellant and decedent. Judgment affirmed.
Judges: Lewis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court· 1957-11-18· cited 30,380×
- Mitchell v. Lawson Milk Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1988-12-30· cited 945×
- Cincinnati v. Beretta U.S.A. Corp.Ohio Supreme Court· 2002-06-12· cited 197×
- Baker v. McKnightOhio Supreme Court· 1983-04-13· cited 59×
- Ament v. Reassure America Life InsuranceOhio Court of Appeals· 2009-01-08· cited 43×
- Tuleta v. Med. Mut. of OhioOhio Court of Appeals· 2014-02-06· cited 35×
- Poulos v. Parker Sweeper Co.Ohio Supreme Court· 1989-07-26· cited 30×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.