Martin v. J.A.M. Distributing Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “employees who engage in different violations of company policy are not similarly situated.”
• noting that a supervisor’s admission that the employee “really pissed [him] off by accusing [him] of discriminating against him” suggested that the employer harbored a retaliatory animus
• unrebutted evidence that employee violated company absenteeism policy established nondiscriminatory pretext for termination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).