· 10/6/1906
Martin v. Hulen & Co.
Citations
- 149 F. 982
- 79 C.C.A. 492
- 1906 U.S. App. LEXIS 4509
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ob- serving that “[a]bandoned applications for patents” cannot “be classed among printed publications, for they . . . are not published by the [PTO]” (cleaned up)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Adams, Hook, Sanborn
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.