Skip to main content

Martin v. Hill

Citations

  • 41 Minn. 337
  • 43 N.W. 337
  • 1889 Minn. LEXIS 355

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that although laches may apply to a county or municipal corporation, “[d]istinction must also be made between property held for strictly public purposes, as for streets, parks, commons, and the like, and property held by the corporation in its private character”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gileillan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.