Skip to main content
· 3/22/1909

Martin v. Gwynn

Citations

  • 90 Ark. 44
  • 117 S.W. 754
  • 1909 Ark. LEXIS 399

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a “contract 18 may be illegal because the consideration was such, or the act to be performed is of that 19 character”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.