Martin v. Golden Key Homes, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that it was “pure speculation” to suggest that the complainant’s knowledge of sexual matters, including vaginal penetration, was inappropriate at 12 years of age
• “The victim was 12 years old when she testified in this case about what occurred when she was almost 8 years old. It is pure speculation to suggest . . . that the victim’s knowledge of sexual matters was inappropriate . . . ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).