Martin v. Gerner

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defects in service of process must be raised in preliminary objections
• holding that the date an interlocutory order was amended to include an appealable issue constituted the date the thirty-day time period of Rule 903(a) began to run irrespective of the fact that the original order was entered more than thirty days earlier
• holding appeal period began to run from order entered on December 18th, which amended prior order entered on November 6th, to include Rule 311(b)(2) language, and rendering interlocutory order appealable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).