Skip to main content
· 5/5/1989

Martin v. George A. Hormel & Co.

Citations

  • 439 N.W.2d 25
  • 1989 Minn. LEXIS 103
  • 1989 WL 44510

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[B]y not asking the court to submit the issue of territorial jurisdiction to the jury to decide, by means of an instruction, the appellant failed to preserve this issue for review.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.