Martin v. Fowler
Citations
- 51 S.C. 164
- 28 S.E. 312
- 1897 S.C. LEXIS 68
Syllabus
<p>1. Estoppel — Pleading—Executors and Administrators. — Where a defendant'admits in his answer the representative character of the plaintiff, he is estopped from afterwards denying it.</p> <p>2. Amendments — Pleadings.—Sec. 194 of the Code, providing for amendment of pleadings, cannot be invoked by a party who has lost his cause.</p> <p>3. Ibid. — Ibid.—Attorney—Excusable Neglect. — When an attorney could have ascertained certain facts by due diligence, he cannot afterwards be relieved of the consequences of his carelessness, under sec. 195 of Code.</p> <p>4. Jurisdiction — Waiver.—Want of jurisdiction of the person may be waived, but not want of jurisdiction of the subject-matter.</p> <p>5. Executors and Administrators. — A grant of letters of administration relates back to the death of the intestate, and legalizes all previous acts of the party as administrator.</p>
Judges: McIver
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Glenn v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1970-04-01· cited 24×
- Coburn v. ColemanW.D. South Carolina· 1947-12-17· cited 16×
- Scruggs v. Chesapeake and Ohio Railway CompanyW.D. Virginia· 1970-12-24· cited 13×
- Concrete Mix, Inc. v. JAMESSupreme Court of South Carolina· 1957-07-01· cited 4×
Cites
1 case in this archive is cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.