Skip to main content
E.D. Pennsylvania· 2/15/2011

Martin v. Ford Motor Co.

Citations

  • 765 F. Supp. 2d 673
  • 2011 WL 570022
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14867

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting the argument that a vehicle recall rendered a claim moot where the court could grant a “partial remedy,” including monetary damages
  • “The [Third Circuit] Rule requires it be clear, from the face of the Complaint, that the claim is barred by the statute of limitations.”
  • plaintiff’s claims were not moot when plaintiff “challenge[d] the adequacy of the [r]ecall, arguing . . . [it] would not remedy the defect in its entirety”
  • “[C]ourts within the Third Circuit have . . . [found] a motion to strike class allegations premature where a motion for class certification has not been made and denied.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Slomsky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.