Martin v. Ford Motor Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting the argument that a vehicle recall rendered a claim moot where the court could grant a “partial remedy,” including monetary damages
• “The [Third Circuit] Rule requires it be clear, from the face of the Complaint, that the claim is barred by the statute of limitations.”
• plaintiff’s claims were not moot when plaintiff “challenge[d] the adequacy of the [r]ecall, arguing . . . [it] would not remedy the defect in its entirety”
• “[C]ourts within the Third Circuit have . . . [found] a motion to strike class allegations premature where a motion for class certification has not been made and denied.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).