Supreme Court of Kansas· 4/10/1976
Martin v. Edwards
Citations
- 548 P.2d 779
- 219 Kan. 466
- 1976 Kan. LEXIS 386
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that a beneficiary can enforce a contract if he is the one who the contracting parties intended should receive a direct benefit from the contract
- \Contracting parties are presumed to act for themselves and therefore an intent to benefit a third person must be clearly expressed in the contract.\
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harman
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.