Skip to main content

Martin v. Edwards

Citations

  • 548 P.2d 779
  • 219 Kan. 466
  • 1976 Kan. LEXIS 386

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that a beneficiary can enforce a contract if he is the one who the contracting parties intended should receive a direct benefit from the contract
  • \Contracting parties are presumed to act for themselves and therefore an intent to benefit a third person must be clearly expressed in the contract.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.