Skip to main content
· 8/23/1996

Martin v. Department of Professional Regulation

Citations

  • 672 N.E.2d 267
  • 284 Ill. App. 3d 591
  • 219 Ill. Dec. 759
  • 1996 Ill. App. LEXIS 635

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that even if the Director of the Department of Professional Regulation had been a necessary party, under Armstead , the court would apply the newly amended section 3--107(a

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cousins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.