Martin v. Dayton School District No. 2

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• district’s initial discharge notice was legally defective because “it stated the school board’s decision to terminate—as a fait accompli—rather than a notice of probable cause for discharge as required by RCW 28A.58.450”
• interpreting ROW 28A.58.450, which was later recodified as ROW 28A.405.300
• interpreting RCW 28A.58.450, which was later recodified as RCW 28A.405.300

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).