Martin v. Copado-Esquivel

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that this rule “does not mean that anytime a defendant makes a post-Miranda statement the prosecution has carte blanche to use the defendant’s silence to impeach him”
• assessing counsel's performance in failing to forward Doyle objection under Strickland test, for purposes of determining whether cause existed for state procedural default
• most courts have held where post-arrest and trial statements involve the same subject matter and the post- arrest statement is sufficiently incomplete to be “arguably inconsistent”, comments upon omissions are permitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).