Skip to main content
· 1/21/1992

Martin v. ConAgra, Inc.

Citations

  • 784 F. Supp. 1394
  • 30 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 1307
  • 1992 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2533
  • 1992 WL 38499

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that “the fact that the participants decide to participate in the program knowing that they will ultimately get to keep the item produced indicates that there is a ‘contemplation of compensation’ ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Vietor

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.