Martin v. Big Apple Deli, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming 7Despite finding FM to be a severe impairment at Step 2, ALJ Kadlec pointed out that the record “reflects inconsistent diagnoses” regarding FM, including: (1
• upholding the ALJ’s decision to discount a treating psychiatrist’s opinion “because it stemmed largely from Plaintiff’s physical condition rather than from psychiatric/psychological conditions, which was Dr. Ranjan’s area of expertise.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).