Skip to main content
· 11/8/1996

Martin v. Airborne Express

Citations

  • 16 F. Supp. 2d 623
  • 4 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1556
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 22150
  • 1996 WL 948795

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • carrier moving goods solely within a state is moving interstate commerce if part of a larger travel scheme evincing continuity of movement between states
  • “At any rate, Martin’s decision to remain in AMR Distribution’s employ after notification of the restructuring negates any related breach of contract claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Britt

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.