Martin Rosendo-Ramirez v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that 1-213 was properly admitted where petitioner “could have made the statement [captured in the Form 1-213] and can point to no evidence that he did not”
• holding court was obliged to apply its own law despite problems created by lack of uniformity in application of immigration laws
• observing that “the 1-213 is supposed to be a record of a conversation with an alien”
• finding no error in admission of Form I-213 as evidence of deportability even though the form was carelessly drafted
• noting the venue provisions “require the BIA to live with uncertainty of which court may review its decisions, and us to live with the strange situation of being asked -6- to review a case that has applied another circuit’s law
• “as here, the petitioner [in Maldona do] had lived in one circuit prior to his apprehension and had resided there since release from INS custody”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).