Martin Roofing, Inc. v. Goldstein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the defendant did not intend to become primarily liable because, among other things, “[t]he language used, as plaintiff stated it, indicated that it was [a] ‘guarantee’, i.e., that defendant was acting as a surety ‘to make sure you [plaintiff] get paid’”
• “There are surety situations in which no writing is required, . . . e.g., . . . where the promise is made to the principal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Other cases named Martin Roofing, Inc. v. Goldstein

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

• Martin Roofing, Inc. v. Goldstein
  Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York· 1983-01-31· cited 2×
• Martin Roofing, Inc. v. Goldstein
  Supreme Court· 1984-03-26· cited 1×